With online streaming services like Netflix and Hulu becoming increasingly popular, many consumers and analysts are starting to wonder whether these alternatives might soon overtake conventional cables companies like Time Warner and Comcast in terms of revenue generated and the number of subscribers. In some aspects, streaming services have already surpassed their cable counterparts, but in other areas such as profits and the amount of content, traditional TV seems to still take the cake. With that said, here’s a closer look at some of the most important factors to consider in the war between the “cord cutters” and providers of traditional TV services like cable, satellite, and antenna-based subscriptions:
Antenna and Satellite Technology Making Streaming More Convenient in Rural Areas
Rural areas in the U.S. account for a surprising 97% of the country’s total land mass, but all that space only has a population of about 60 million, or about 20% of the American population. These rural residents often have to settle for less than ideal internet connections that don’t provide enough consistent bandwidth to facilitate streaming across multiple devices. On the other hand, traditional Cable TV Supplier services offer a much faster and diverse viewing experience, providing reliable cable tv services, with hundreds of channels bundled into a single easily browsable package. As Indreviews has pointed out, there are also more than a dozen high-power HDTV antennas that strengthen signals for these rural residents, making online streaming services less of an exclusive option. If you’re into online gaming a short throw projector can turn any room into a game room. An rf material for PCB is also used in many industries including television broadcasting,
Online Streaming Services Not Offering Enough
Although Netflix has more subscribers than all the cable companies in the U.S., the size of their library has been cut in half in recent years, dropping from almost 11,000 titles to only 5,000. Being that the cost of a Netflix subscription is only about $10 per month, it makes sense that plenty of people would subscribe to this service as an extra streaming service that can be used in addition to traditional TV when looking for shows and movies on mobile devices. However, many Netflix subscribers also have other TV services in their home including Spectrum Cable TV Packages, so the two customer bases intersect with each other in a way that is inevitably favorable for a traditional TV provider because their price point is much higher, which bring us to our next point.
Streaming Services Not Charging Enough
Taking Netflix, for example, since they pioneered the online streaming service model and now their competition is following similar pricing strategies, a typical online streaming provider charges about $10-$20 per month. That means that, hypothetically, Netflix would need to have 10x more subscribers than the leading cable company, and most of those subscribers need to not have cable, in order for Netflix to make them the same amount of money as a leading TV service provider.
It’s Not Really a Direct Competition
In 2016, Comcast struck a deal with Netflix to make the service part of their X1 platform, which is used by almost a third of Comcast customers. Of course, this was an unavoidable consequence of being in a competition with companies that have the ability to buy you out and execute a merger with ease. With that in mind, it seems that traditional TV services are well-poised to acquire and assimilate most of the existing popular online streaming services in the near future.